Ad Me


Parcheesi?







Archive for the ‘Disco Daily’ Category

Video Wednesday: Disney Disco

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010







Disney’s given us a lot of great animation over the years: Pinocchio. Fantasia. The Lion King. But I recently stumbled across the following and, well, I haven’t been this excited about a cartoon since I saw the trailer for Toy Story 3.

Here’s the backstory: in 1979 Disney tried to cash in on the popularity for all-things disco by releasing an album that included both disco-fied Disney songs and Disney-fied disco songs. Their plan worked; the album was a hit and eventually sold enough copies to be certified double platinum. It’s out-of-print now, but if you’re dying to listen to “Macho Duck” or “Watch out for Goofy!” in their entirety, all the songs are available on iTunes.

Disney also released an accompanying seven-minute animated Super 8 reel set to music. Watch a brief history about that video (and the video itself) below. (Hat tip to my friends over at Retro Thing for producing such a great piece.)




If DJ’s Aren’t Rockstars, What Are They?

Friday, February 19th, 2010

I saw something the other day that really made me reconsider my perspective on musical performance. All the answers I once thought I had have suddenly become questions all over again. What makes a musician “good?” Or rather, what exactly is it that makes for a positive experience at a show? Having been brought up in a society that encourages us to pursue our dreams because “with enough practice anything is possible,” most of us would likely assume that it’s a musician’s musical talent more than anything that decides the outcome of his performance, and trust me, it is most definitely an arguable point. But now let me share with you my experience from a few nights ago.

The lineup (excluding the awful celebrity DJ’s) was A-Trak, followed by Steve Aoki. Now, I respect both of these men to infinity and beyond (I’m a nerd, I know), but let’s be honest, as DJ’s, one of them is just a little bit more talented than the other. That is, one of them won the DMC world championship in turntableism at age 15, and the other…. erm… knows how to beat match with Serato? That being the case, I fully expected A-Trak to steal the show–but I was wrong. Despite his incredible skill, and his massively superior set (which included the ridiculous Robot Rock jam he’s become so well known for), A-Trak’s show as a whole paled in comparison. He played his entire set to a crowd that seemed to have forgotten how to do anything more than a reluctant shuffle to the beat. And even then, it seemed like the little dancing that was going on was more out of respect for him as an artist than an actual desire to dance. For some reason, the energy just wasn’t there, and I could not for the life of me figure out why. That is until Aoki took over.

Here’s the magic of it all: What did Steve do when he took control of the turntables? Did he put on some kind of miraculous display of musical prowess? Did he have a gnarly intro and a set full of never before heard tracks? Nope. He played Warp. He played Warp, and then proceeded to climb atop the DJ booth with his arms spread wide like Christ himself, whilst screaming “I just want!I just want!” at the top of his lungs, and the crowd lost it. It didn’t matter that we were all dancing to a tune we had heard a thousand times over, and it didn’t matter that the DJ wasn’t even standing behind the decks while we all went nuts. The energy was there, and that was everything.

Game over. Everything I thought I knew about music went into the trash can. If it’s not talent that makes a good show, then what is it? Am I even there for the music? Do I even like music? What is music? What is a musician? And for god’s sake, why is watching someone play records fun?

Have you ever had to explain to someone who’s new to the scene what a DJ’s roll actually is? People ask me all the time, and it never fails, after I finish my five minute breakdown on “keeping the energy high” and “reading the crowd” and all that junk us DJ’s use to justify our trade, the person I’m explaining it to says something along the lines of, “So wait, why wouldn’t you just put on an iTunes playlist?” I used to just shrug it off as ignorance, but having had this near religious experience, that question seems to carry a lot more weight than it used to. I’ve seen crowds go crazy for DJ sets that were literally worse than iTunes playlists. Does that imply that we could all have just a great of a time dancing to a computer? Probably not. But where’s the line? Why does watching a DJ play a track on turntables get us off so much more effectively than if he were to double click it in iTunes? After all, it is the same mp3 file, is it not?

Now, I’m not pretending to be the guy with answers, but one cannot be subject to such profound realization without being forced to draw a couple conclusions. So here’s my theory: All those people that take it upon themselves to convince the world that DJ’s aren’t rockstars? They’re flat out wrong. DJ’s couldn’t be any closer to rockstars. Think about it. Rock has never been about the musicians’ talent. Shit, take a look at ACDC’s frontman. There isn’t a chance in a million that a guy like that could even make it through American Idol’s tryouts, and yet he’s the pillar supporting one of the world’s most successful bands of all time. Their fame came not from harmonies perfectly complimenting melodies, but from random acts of insanity, colorful light shows, fireworks, and that strut thing that the guitarist always liked to do across the stage. That was it. They were gods, and the people who saw their shows were paying not to hear their music, but to experience what it’s like to be in the presence of a bunch of out-of-control deities who represent everything that a human being really wants in life: sex and carefree mayhem, and these are things that any musician, rockstar or DJ, can provide.

So what was it that made Steve Aoki’s party so much better than A-Traks? The same thing that keeps artists like The Bloody Beetroots and Rusko, and countless other charismatic DJ’s at the top of festival bills: they’re symbols that exist in an almost fictional world. They’re like that character in a book that everyone wants to be, and they carry with the the same weight that celebrities like Paris Hilton do. What are they famous for? It doesn’t matter. If they look right (long haired Japanese guy, italian punks with venom masks, mowhawked british bloke) and act right (front flipping into a crowd, pouring Greygoose down the tiniest little asian girls throat, wearing neon green glow glasses and shooting laser beams to the sound of the bass), worship is bound to ensue.

Anyway, that’s my little bit of existential bullshit. Take it or leave it. But even if you choose to leave it, make sure you don’t pass up this bit of UK Funky (which is in no way related to any of the above). It’s a groovy little jam, to say the least.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Donaeo – Party Hard

Video Wednesday: Feist on Sesame Street

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

As if we needed another reason to love Feist. Check out this video of her on Sesame Street singing a kid-friendly version of her hit song “1234″ (and parodying her own fantastic music video) to teach kids to count.








Lest Ye Be Judged

Sunday, February 14th, 2010






A DJ’s primary job (or, if you prefer, “purpose”) is choosing songs. For a while it was his only job—back when turntables didn’t have pitch control and scratching was a surefire way to break your record player and destroy your vinyl all at once.*** A DJ was a one-trick pony, playing one song after another until the party ended. Hence, the only way to compare one DJ with another was by his song selection. A better DJ played better songs. (Of course, the argument “What makes a better selection of songs?” is even harder to settle. But the logic still follows that whoever played better songs was a better DJ.)

***Insert long David Foster Wallace-esque footnote here: A turntable is basically a motor that spins a metal disk at a constant speed. There are two types of turntables: belt-drive and direct-drive. A belt-drive turntable has the motor off to the side. That motor is connected to the spinning axle via an elastic band. This band isn’t strong enough to withstand any serious scratching, and over time the band deteriorates until it must be replaced. This was the standard for years, and it’s probably what your parents used when they first listened to the Beatles.
A direct-drive turntable has a motor directly underneath the spinning disc. This design makes a record reach the proper RPM much quicker; you need a direct-drive turntable if you’re going to scratch. Even better, there’s no elastic band to replace. The catch? For a long time turntable motors were loud and clunky; the motor vibrated during playback and made the needle jump. This shaking damaged the vinyl itself and created rough, irregular playback. But modern motors are quiet enough to keep the record spinning consistently and the needle firmly in the groove. Direct-drive turntables are preferred by every serious DJ, though they’re typically more expensive.




Back to the main point: DJs were choosing songs, and we were comparing them by those songs. But DJing evolved (along with the equipment) and there was another criterion by which to judge DJs: technical ability. The best DJs knew how to use the equipment. They could beatmatch perfectly; they could EQ songs with just the right amount of high, middle and low frequencies; they could use samplers or effects processors or any number of sequencers, drum machines and synthesizers. Learning to use this equipment was hard. But those who mastered the machinery were considered better DJs. Two DJs could play the exact same songs, but one could play a better set depending on how he played the songs. Technical ability mattered.





Today, software like Serato Scratch Live and Ableton Live make the technical aspect of DJing much easier to learn. Modern DJs aren’t learning to use hardware, they’re learning to use software (or some combination of hardware and software).

For example, beatmatching used to be the most important technical skill a DJ could learn. It took years to perfect that ability. Now it’s a breeze. I’m pretty sure I could teach anyone with a decent ear and a few hours of free time to beatmatch songs using Serato. Ableton literally beatmatches for you, assuming your songs are quantized correctly beforehand.









There are two main implications to the rise of software-driven DJ sets:

First, I think we’re all better off because amateur DJs don’t sound as amateurish. Nothing is more painful to listen to than shitty scratching or off-beat mixing. Software corrects some of that. It’s easier to be a mediocre DJ, and mediocre DJing is better than bad DJing. And the fact that DJing is easier to learn also means more people are doing it. That doesn’t mean they’re doing it well, but they’re still doing it. More people DJing is, on the aggregate, a good thing. Even if they’re bad DJs, they probably pay money to see other DJs or in some other way help “the scene.” On a more personal note, many of them also read this blog.

There are certainly purists (read: turntablists) who scoff at the idea of using anything more than two turntables and a mixer, but those people are in the minority. Most DJs use a laptop or, at the very least, CDJs (which, by the way, are still digital rather than analog and often have some sort of built-in software package that’s essentially just a scaled-down version of Serato). It’s both foolish and futile to oppose DJing software. If it makes the set better (“better” meaning “let’s the artist get the exact sound he wants”) then I’m all for it. But then again, there are also people who prefer an acoustic guitar to an electric guitar because that’s the sound they want. It’s just personal preference.





Second, DJs are again primarily judged by the songs they play. We’ve come full circle. Operating Serato/Ableton still requires a certain amount of “skill” (should I even include quotation marks there anymore?). But software helps level the playing field and, more importantly, adjust the learning curve. Once all DJs become the same in their ability to use the software, the only judging criterion left is—you guessed it—song selection. Technical proficiency isn’t a valid criterion for comparison anymore because everyone is technically proficient. Maybe we’ll eventually get to the point where all a DJ will be able to do is chose songs while the software takes care of the rest. Where do we go from there?

Kissy Sell Out








My favorite DJ right now? Tough to answer. But the first person who comes to mind is Kissy Sell Out. He’s got the technical ability that every great DJ has, but his song selection is top-notch. He’ll play a set with music from all over the place and somehow make it all work. For example, a recent performance of his included songs by Rusko, Cat Stevens, Bone Thugs-n-Harmony, M83 and Machines Don’t Care. The tracklist reads like a total clusterfuck, as if he just hit “shuffle” and played whatever came up next. But if you listen to the mix you’ll realize he pulls it off like nobody else could.

My favorite thing about Kissy Sell Out is that he remixes songs exclusively for his live sets (appropriately titled “Kissy Klub Versions”). See him perform and you’ll hear a track that’s never been released and never will be; his hard drive must be loaded with homemade gems. It’s actually a little frustrating—much of his stuff is fantastic and the fact that I can’t get the individual songs drives me crazy. But it makes his live sets that much more exciting. I never know what he’s going to play and I’ll probably never get to hear some of those Kissy Klub Versions again. The songs add a thrilling sense of once-in-a-lifetime urgency to his performances.

Enjoy this original track from his album Youth and a fun R.E.M. bmore-inspired remix.





Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Kissy Sell Out – Garden Friends

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

R.E.M. – Nightswimming (Kissy Sell Out Remix)






Video Wednesday: Nice Clean Rap

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

My friend David and I were discussing Family Guy the other day and came to the following conclusion: every episode has one laugh-out-loud moment and one joke that drags on for waaaay too long. The clip below is the former.




The Structure of Sound

Monday, February 8th, 2010

People always ask me how they can “get into” dance music. I never have a good answer to this other than “listen to a lot of it.” But if you’re going to listen to more of the genre, it’s important to train your ear to listen to dance music. Let me explain.

Most songs written in the last fifty years follow a similar structure: verse – chorus – verse – chorus – bridge – chorus. We’re all used to hearing music like this. Sometimes I even think our brains have an innate affinity for an A-B-A-B-C-B structure (doesn’t this pattern show up all over the world independently?). But not all music follows that arrangement. Jazz fans are used to hearing a 64-bar improvisation in the middle of a song. And people who listen to jam bands are used to the whole, err, jammy-ness of them. Dance music is a little different, too.

At this point it’s probably better to distinguish between two different subsets of dance music: “songs” and “tracks.” The distinction is arbitrary, but I’ll use it for simplicity. Songs follow the same verse-chorus structure outlined above (but they’re got a BPM high enough to make the listener move). Dance tracks are structured something like this: intro, build, drop, bridge, build, drop, outro. They oscillate periodically and are built around escalation and release.

Tracks aren’t made for top 40 radio station, they’re made for DJs to mix into the middle of a set. That should explain 32 bars of drums at the beginning and end. The intro/outro makes blending one track into another much easier (especially if you’re using real vinyl). Sure, you can listen to tracks on their own; I always do. But most people don’t want thirty seconds of drums at the beginning of every song. That’s why there’s often a “Radio Version” on the b-side of a twelve inch. DJ’s use one side for mixing into a set, radio stations use the other. Form follows function.

So if you’re going to “get into” dance music you’ll have to re-train your ear for a different song structure. How do you do that? I’ll repeat: listen to a lot of dance music. And don’t fast-forward through those drums at the beginning. The intro is there for a reason.

This old house track from Phortune is a good example. It doesn’t have a verse or chorus. It’s just one catchy loop and some simple drums that periodically change. A variation on a theme, if you will. And it’s got an intro and an outro designed to facilitate a smooth crossfade.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Phortune – String Free

This track from Louis La Roche works, too. To visualize what I’m talking about, I’ve included a waveform graphic of the tracks’s first 36 bars. Try to “follow along” with the picture underneath while you listen. It’ll all make sense.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Louis La Roche – Sunshine Hotel (Original Mix)